YOU be the Lawyer #1
I’m currently taking Product Liability with professor Bruce Ottley. I’ve already taken Civil Procedure and Remedies with him, and will probably take whatever class he teaches next semester.

Yesterday, in Ottley’s Product Liability class, we went over a case called HAUTER v. ZOGARTS. In it, defendant Zogarts manufactured a product called the “Golfing Gizmo,” a training device used to help golfers improve their swing. “The Gizmo is a simple device consisting of two metal pegs, two cords—one elastic, one cotton—and a regulation golf ball.” To make a long explanation short, the Gizmo works like a slingshot.
Defendant Zogarts advertised the Golfing Gizmo by saying, “COMPLETELY SAFE. BALL WILL NOT HIT PLAYER.” They also put that phrase on the product’s label and on the cover of the product’s instruction booklet.
Well, ball hit player, and player was thirteen-year-old Fred Hauter, who suffered “extreme pain and dizziness,” unconsciousness, and brain damage. The Gizmo left Hauter epileptic.

The court held that defendant Zogarts misrepresented a material fact upon which Plaintiff Hauter relied. In other words, the court ruled for plaintiff Hauter.
Here’s my question to you:
IF YOU WERE REPRESENTING DEFENDANT ZOGARTS, WHAT WOULD YOU ARGUE ON THEIR BEHALF?
Technorati Tags: Product Liability, Defendant, Injury
Posted in YOU be the Lawyer |
15 Comments »



